According to a study of FEC filings, the Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign has more cash on hand than all of the Democratic Party’s official campaign organizations combined.
The final Mueller report should be graded “incomplete,” says VIPS, whose forensic work proves the speciousness of the story that DNC emails published by WikiLeaks came from Russian hacking.
While Democrats speculated widely about a mythical plot between the Trump campaign and Russia, no attention was given to the more substantial ties and deals between Democratic officials and Russia.
A comprehensive review that chronicles the past two years of extensive research and investigation into the Guccifer 2.0 case, evaluating all of the discoveries made during the last two years, as well as the various challenges received, and to provide an up-to-date status on the validity of different areas of research into Guccifer 2.0.
The smear campaign against Kim DotCom was so effective that the lies surrounding the Moment of Truth event are being resold up to this very day.
Published almost 2 years ago, in the aftermath of Hillary Clinton’s shattering defeat by the least popular, dangerously unqualified presidential candidate in U.S. history — a loss that Hillary and the DNC refused to own, immediately diverting all the blame to Russia and James Comey while relentlessly cultivating the narrative of Trump/Putin collusion and “Russian meddling” to suppress and discredit the damning revelations within the WikiLeaks emails of the DNC rigging the primary against Bernie Sanders — Craig Murray gives his firsthand account debunking anonymous CIA claims pushing the Russiagate collusion narrative.
WikiLeaks has just been served …with a tweet.
The official narrative rests entirely on the premise that the DNC’s server was hacked by “Guccifer 2.0” — a persona whose very plausibility as a Russian intelligence officer completely falls apart upon consideration of the enormous mass of evidence in absolute contradiction of this notion.
In November 2017, the DNC quietly changed their Russian hacking narrative via an Associated Press report, invalidating the circumstantial evidence that had been used to support the DNC’s Russian hacking claims, and representing a groundbreaking contradiction that has gone unobserved by establishment press outlets.
The Forensicator, who revealed last year that files published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona were accessed locally and not hacked, has just published a new analysis, the first of three articles which will comprise a series centered once again on the work of Guccifer 2.0.
According to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), who visited Julian Assange at the London Ecuadorian embassy in August 2017, the WikiLeaks founder possesses physical evidence proving Russia did not hack the DNC. Assange has consistently held that the emails were leaked by an insider for the past 2 years.
As Russia-gate continues to buffet the Trump administration, we now know that the “scandal” started with Democrats funding the original dubious allegations of Russian interference, notes Joe Lauria.
It never ceases to amaze how intelligence agency narratives always seem to trip over their own shoelaces. This “huge story” is transparently ridiculous to anyone with the slightest technical know-how.
New forensic evidence supports Julian Assange’s repeated assertions that the DNC emails (containing damning proof that the party had rigged the 2016 primary election against Bernie Sanders) published by Wikileaks came from a leak, challenging claims that Russia had “hacked” the DNC.